Supreme Court Affirms Olofa's Selection
In his lead judgment, Onnoghen held that the appointment by the Kwara Government was in line with the customs and tradition of the people of Offa. Onnoghen held that Anilelerin is the only authentic ruling house that could ascend the thrown of Olofa, adding that the Olugbense ruling house had no historical backing.
"From the history, customs and tradition of the people of Offa, it is clear that Anilelerin ruling house, is the authentic and only ruling house backed by native law and authority that can ascend the thrown of Olofa.'' He also dismissed the principle of rotation of the kingship in Offa land. "If there is rotation as claimed by the Olugbense family, the principle will have started before the ascension of the immediate past Olofa, Oba Mustapha Olanipekun.
"This court also found, as a fact, that there is no rotational policy in existence as far as the stool of Olofa of Offa is concerned. "The claim of the Olugbense family has no historical backing and therefore, the claim of the appellant, through a counter claim on the issue, succeed and is hereby affirmed."
The court also held that the ascension to the throne is by election and not by rotation as claimed by the Olugbense family. He also declared the state government Gazette of 1970, which recognised Olugbense ruling house was null and void because it was contrary to the customs and tradition of the people of Offa.
The apex court also set aside the judgments secured by the plaintiffs at the state High Court and the Court of Appeal Division in Ilorin. The court, however, expressed the hope that the customs and traditions of the people being dynamic was subject to changes depending on the practices of people concern at the particular time.
"It is hoped that in due course Offa people, particularly the ruling house will see need and reasons to effect necessary changes to enable Olugbense descendants ascend the stool ones again."
The court encouraged the people to talk things over and find a peaceful solution to the problem and advice the state government accordingly. Alhaji Saka Adeyemo, Abdulrauf Adegboyega Keji and Saka Keji of Olugbense family had challenged the appointment of Gbadamosi as Esuwoye II.
They contended that the appointment contravened Section 3(3) of Kwara State Government Edict on appointment of and deposition Chief's law of 1970. The claimants had said that the law made provision for rotation between their family and the Anilelerin family.
In their originating summons argued on their behalf by Mr John Olusola Baiyashea (SAN), the plaintiffs claimed that it was their turn to produce the Olofa in line with the principle of rotation. Oba Gbadamosi was represented by a team of lawyers led by Mr Yusuf Olaolu Ali (SAN)
Cloud Tag: What's trending
Click on a word/phrase to read more about it.
Tuesday Assayomo Ayodele Olaosebikan Olokoba Ajikobi Hassan A. Saliu Tafida Muhammadu Buhari Al-Adaby Sango-UITH Road Sam Onile Ahmed \'Lateef Oyeyemi Olasumbo Florence Simon Sayomi Kwarareports Col. Ibrahim Taiwo Amusement Park Moses Afolayan Abubakar Abdulraheem Awoye Bolaji Nagode KWASAA Saliu Mustapha Kulende Raliat Elelu-Habeeb AbdulRahman Saad IDPU Egbewole Idi-Ape Abiodun Abdulkareem Eghe Igbinehi Joseph Daudu Kwara State Infrastructure Development Fund General Hospital, Offa Akom Construction And Engineering Synergy Ltd Ojo Fadumila Abdulmumini AbdulRazaq Bello Abubakar Muritala Awodun Musa Abdullahi Abatemi-Usman Kwara State Government Goodluck Jonathan Ibrahim Issa Jetti Bukola Saraki Suleiman Abubakar Mohammed Ibrahim Lola Ashiru Baruten Wahab Egbewole Shuaib Boni Aliyu Bashiru Makama UNILORIN Alumni NAWOJ SARS Abdulwahab Oba Hussein Oloyede Alaiye Lanre Aremu Muyideen Ajani Bello Saeedat Aliyu Kwara Politics Abdulkadir Orire George Innih Baba Idris Hajj Bello John Olanrewaju Razaq Atunwa Aminu Adisa Logun Azeez Salawu Mufutau Olatinwo Read With Me Ayo Opadokun Iyabo Adisa Ibiyeye Mary Arinde Kwara State Fish Farmers Association AbdulRaheem Ahmad Shayi Okin High School

