Supreme Court Affirms Olofa's Selection
In his lead judgment, Onnoghen held that the appointment by the Kwara Government was in line with the customs and tradition of the people of Offa. Onnoghen held that Anilelerin is the only authentic ruling house that could ascend the thrown of Olofa, adding that the Olugbense ruling house had no historical backing.
"From the history, customs and tradition of the people of Offa, it is clear that Anilelerin ruling house, is the authentic and only ruling house backed by native law and authority that can ascend the thrown of Olofa.'' He also dismissed the principle of rotation of the kingship in Offa land. "If there is rotation as claimed by the Olugbense family, the principle will have started before the ascension of the immediate past Olofa, Oba Mustapha Olanipekun.
"This court also found, as a fact, that there is no rotational policy in existence as far as the stool of Olofa of Offa is concerned. "The claim of the Olugbense family has no historical backing and therefore, the claim of the appellant, through a counter claim on the issue, succeed and is hereby affirmed."
The court also held that the ascension to the throne is by election and not by rotation as claimed by the Olugbense family. He also declared the state government Gazette of 1970, which recognised Olugbense ruling house was null and void because it was contrary to the customs and tradition of the people of Offa.
The apex court also set aside the judgments secured by the plaintiffs at the state High Court and the Court of Appeal Division in Ilorin. The court, however, expressed the hope that the customs and traditions of the people being dynamic was subject to changes depending on the practices of people concern at the particular time.
"It is hoped that in due course Offa people, particularly the ruling house will see need and reasons to effect necessary changes to enable Olugbense descendants ascend the stool ones again."
The court encouraged the people to talk things over and find a peaceful solution to the problem and advice the state government accordingly. Alhaji Saka Adeyemo, Abdulrauf Adegboyega Keji and Saka Keji of Olugbense family had challenged the appointment of Gbadamosi as Esuwoye II.
They contended that the appointment contravened Section 3(3) of Kwara State Government Edict on appointment of and deposition Chief's law of 1970. The claimants had said that the law made provision for rotation between their family and the Anilelerin family.
In their originating summons argued on their behalf by Mr John Olusola Baiyashea (SAN), the plaintiffs claimed that it was their turn to produce the Olofa in line with the principle of rotation. Oba Gbadamosi was represented by a team of lawyers led by Mr Yusuf Olaolu Ali (SAN)
Cloud Tag: What's trending
Click on a word/phrase to read more about it.
Durosinlohun Kawu Atiku Ethical College Olayinka Oladapo Jogunola Erin-ile SSUCOEN Alabi Lawal Senate Col. Ibrahim Taiwo Saliu Tunde Bello Trader Moni Ilorin Airport Sobi Sayomi Abdulrosheed Okiki Falokun-Oja Budo Egba Sobi Specialist Hospital Oko-Olowo Bahago Hassanat Bello Mujtabah Bature Moses Salami Olomu Adekunle David Dunmade Elewu Moses Afolayan Hijab Isiaka Abdulrazak AbdulGaniyu Kareem Harafat E. Mukadam Alore Public Holiday Park Aliyu Olatunji Ajanaku Aliyu Alhassan Adesoye Moses Adekanye Damilola Yusuf Kayode Issa Bolaji Nagode Idofin GAMA Yusuf Aiyedun Ayodele Kuburat Olaosebikan Societe Generale Bank Of Nigeria Nigeria Foundation For Artificial Intelligence Tsado Manman Ahmed Haruna Tambiri Mohammed Ilota NITDA Gbenga Adebayo Principal Private Secretary Shaykh Luqman Jimoh Susan Modupe Oluwole Florence Saraki Akom Construction And Engineering Synergy Ltd Freshvine Nigeria Limited Nigeria Governors\' Forum Mohammed Lawal Bola Tinubu Yinka Aluko Bayo Mohammed Onimode Abdulganiyu Salahudeen Sulyman Atolagbe Alege Omoniyi Ayinla Ariyo Kanu Agabi Special Adviser On Digital Innovation Eleja Oke-Ode CBT Wahab Olasupo Egbewole Awoye Maryam Nurudeen Bukola Saraki

