Supreme Court Affirms Olofa's Selection
In his lead judgment, Onnoghen held that the appointment by the Kwara Government was in line with the customs and tradition of the people of Offa. Onnoghen held that Anilelerin is the only authentic ruling house that could ascend the thrown of Olofa, adding that the Olugbense ruling house had no historical backing.
"From the history, customs and tradition of the people of Offa, it is clear that Anilelerin ruling house, is the authentic and only ruling house backed by native law and authority that can ascend the thrown of Olofa.'' He also dismissed the principle of rotation of the kingship in Offa land. "If there is rotation as claimed by the Olugbense family, the principle will have started before the ascension of the immediate past Olofa, Oba Mustapha Olanipekun.
"This court also found, as a fact, that there is no rotational policy in existence as far as the stool of Olofa of Offa is concerned. "The claim of the Olugbense family has no historical backing and therefore, the claim of the appellant, through a counter claim on the issue, succeed and is hereby affirmed."
The court also held that the ascension to the throne is by election and not by rotation as claimed by the Olugbense family. He also declared the state government Gazette of 1970, which recognised Olugbense ruling house was null and void because it was contrary to the customs and tradition of the people of Offa.
The apex court also set aside the judgments secured by the plaintiffs at the state High Court and the Court of Appeal Division in Ilorin. The court, however, expressed the hope that the customs and traditions of the people being dynamic was subject to changes depending on the practices of people concern at the particular time.
"It is hoped that in due course Offa people, particularly the ruling house will see need and reasons to effect necessary changes to enable Olugbense descendants ascend the stool ones again."
The court encouraged the people to talk things over and find a peaceful solution to the problem and advice the state government accordingly. Alhaji Saka Adeyemo, Abdulrauf Adegboyega Keji and Saka Keji of Olugbense family had challenged the appointment of Gbadamosi as Esuwoye II.
They contended that the appointment contravened Section 3(3) of Kwara State Government Edict on appointment of and deposition Chief's law of 1970. The claimants had said that the law made provision for rotation between their family and the Anilelerin family.
In their originating summons argued on their behalf by Mr John Olusola Baiyashea (SAN), the plaintiffs claimed that it was their turn to produce the Olofa in line with the principle of rotation. Oba Gbadamosi was represented by a team of lawyers led by Mr Yusuf Olaolu Ali (SAN)
Cloud Tag: What's trending
Click on a word/phrase to read more about it.
Raliat AbdulRazaq Aminu Adisa Logun Sambo Murtala Saba Mamman Daniel Afolasade Opeyemi Kemi Tuesday Assayomo Yemi Sanni Sheikh Hamzat Yusuf Ariyibi ARMTI Kwara State Coalition Of Business And Professional Associations Esuwoye Olatunji Abdulmumeen Funmi Salau Sherif Shagaya Sadiq Umar Suleiman Alege Kuranga Yoonus Lawal Democracy Day Hijaab Mohammed Yahaya Barki Bluenile Associates Ibrahim Abduquadri Abikan Kolawole Akande Yomi Adeboye Ibraheem Abdullateef Alaiye Olosi Of Osi March 18 SSUCOEN Just Event Online Sulyman Atolagbe Alege Hassan A. Saliu Haruna Olawale Sulaiman Olaosebikan Abiodun Jacob Ajiboye Adamu Atta MAI Akande John Mayokun Dada Ijagbo Health Centre Odogun Olushola Gabriel Ojuekun Shaaba Lafiagi Donatus Ejidike Kunbi Titiloye Saheed Akinwumi Abraysports FC Sheikh Ridhwanullah Alore Oyun Olufolake Abdulrazaq SGBN Mahfouz Adedimeji Mamatu Abdullahi University Road Dunmade Onilu Elerinjare-Ibobo JMK Construction Company Limited Olam Food Ingredients Lanre Badmus Ilorin Metro Park Kamaldeen Kehinde Dasuki Belgore Olohungbebe Rihanat Ajia Ajibike Katibi College Of Health CBT Ibrahim Gambari Kayode Ibrahim Iqra Books Agbarigidoma Ayo Opadokun Marafan Shonga Gbajabiamila Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa Firdaos Amasa

